The two graphs, bar graph depicts international Japanese travellers whereas the line graph illustrates proportion of Japanese tourism belonging to Australia.
Overall, it can be observed that Japanese people travelling internationally increased between 1985 to 1995 and the Australian’s part of Japan’s tourism saw a dramatic rise in the 10-year period.
From the year 1985 to 1990, people chose to visit abroad for various purposes from Japan and it went on increasing significantly from 5 million to 11 million people respectively, whereas there was a slight decrease in the number of tourists in the year 1991 which was around 11 million but from 1992 the individuals went on increasing which rose approximately to 15 million in the year 1995 respectively.
After the analysis of the Australian role in Japanese tourism, it was seen that people moving to Australia went on highly increasing until 1988 which ranged around 4.5 %. Suddenly there was a slight decrease in the visitors in 1989, then from 1990 to 1993 there was a surge in Japanese tourists visiting Australia that was around 6.5 million approximately. In 1994, slight decline in Japanese visitors was observed.
- The charts below give information about world spending and population Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- IELTS WRITING TASK I The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 62
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 11
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30319148936 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01824839157 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547872340426 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.78449895 43.030603864 241% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.166666667 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224911334025 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122253653404 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388212007865 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143772913024 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037858649932 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.