The bar chart illustrates the number of tourists locating Japan journeying from 1985 to 1995. The line graph provides data about how many people coming to Australia for touristic purpose in the same period.
Overall, we can clearly see that touristic travelling to abroad of Japanese showed upward trend with fluctuated some points during the period. Also Australia's number of Japanese visitors grew between 1985 to 1995.
Based on the chart, in the beginning of the period (1985), nearly 5 million of Japanese travelled abroad to touristic purpose. Number of Japanese excursionist going abroad climbed to approximately 11 million in 1990. Moreover, number of Japanese traveller fluctuated next two years and then rose to almost 15 million the end of the period.
In line graph, in the same period, percentage of people going to Australia from Japan for touristic purpose increased significantly by about 4.7% till 1988. In the next two years of the period, proportion of coming visitors fluctuated and then this percent grew considerably with 6.2% by 1995.
'ın conclusion, two graph showed near same upward trend during the same period.
- IELTS 10 Test 3 Writing task 1 The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 73
- Life now is better than it was 100 years ago To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 52
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world. 78
- The proliferation of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation sys 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od. Overall, we can clearly see that touristic travelling to abroad of Japane...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...uctuated some points during the period. Also Australias number of Japanese visitors ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost 15 million the end of the period. In line graph, in the same period, perce...
^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and then this percent grew considerably with 6.2% by 1995. ın conclusion, two...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...rew considerably with 6.2% by 1995. ın conclusion, two graph showed near same ...
^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'graph' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
...ith 6.2% by 1995. ın conclusion, two graph showed near same upward trend during th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27868852459 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65534414318 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530054644809 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3979926272 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377118728378 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171494932979 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11351002624 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214488731359 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141738717815 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.