The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information.
The bar chart compares how many international travelers paid a visit to Japan over the 10-year period since 1985 and the line graph illustrates the percentage of Australian citizens going to Japan from 1985 to1994. Overall, there was an increasing variation in both the number of foreign tourists to Japan and the proportion of Australian visiting Japan. In addition, the greatest gap can be seen between 1994 and 1995 for the bar chart and between 1985 and 1986 for the line graph.
In 1985, just under 5 million tourist set their foot in Japan. This number increased gradually to about 11 million in 1990, which was more than twice that of 1985. After fluctuating slightly over the period of 4 years from 1990, the number of foreign visitors rose steadily and ended with more than 15 million in the last year.
Additionally, exactly 2% of japan's tourists was from Australia, which was the lowest figure during the given period. In the following years, Japan witnessed an increasing variation in the proportion of Australian travellers, hitting a peak at more than 6% in the year 1993 before decreasing slightly to 6% in the next year.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981 ,1991 and 2001 78
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in thrèe different countries in the U.S state of oregon. 56
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in thrèe different countries in the U.S state of oregon. 61
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information. 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tizens going to Japan from 1985 to1994. Overall, there was an increasing variati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88144329897 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5932753525 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4572943425 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1459381805 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727806113894 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493285231827 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976888312793 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502359575245 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.