The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart provides information about how many Japanese people travelled to other countries over a period of 10 years. The line graph illustrates the percentage of Japanese tourists who had a trip to Australia in the same period of time.

It can be seen from the chart, generally, there was an upward trend in traveling abroad among the Japanese tourists from 1985 to 1995. Moreover, Australia’s share of Japan’s tourist market showed a gradual increase almost each year during the selected period of time.

In 1985, the number of Japanese travelers was about 5 million and until 1990, it increased significantly to around 6 million. During the rest of the five years of the period, it can still be said that the figure increased gradually from 11 million in 1990 to 15 million in1995.

Turing to the line graph, the Australian tourist sector saw a threefold increase from 1985 to 1995 of Japanese tourists. Especially till 1989, there was a remarkable rise from 2% to around 5%. Although the proportion of Japanese people who travelled to Australia decreased slightly in 1990, after that there was an upward trend which ended in 1996, at 6%.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...who had a trip to Australia in the same period of time. It can be seen from the chart, gene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...se almost each year during the selected period of time. In 1985, the number of Japanese tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73394422384 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4515141292 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295996991721 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125109889125 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790446432424 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189600882771 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985154348436 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.