The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.

Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate.

The table below provides information about different modes of transportation in England in years 1985 and 2000. Four modes, walking, bicycle, local bus and other transportation system declined in the year 2000 in contrast with the year 1985, and on the other hand using of car, long distance bus, train and taxi have risen after the year 1985. Overall, total distance regardless of any modes increased in the year 2000 by comparing with 5 years before.

The second column of table is showing that the most popular transportation system is related to car, and taxi is the last selection for travel in England. As the table illustrates, there is a marginal difference between using bicycle and long distance bus.

The third column shows that the maximum usage has been for car as well as the year 1985. It seems that taxi and bicycle have been less popular than other transportation modes and there is a few difference between these two. However, the bicycle selection for transportation had the last place among others, and there was a huge and drastic difference between using car and using bicycle in the year 2000.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-18 Muhammad Hassam Saeed 56 view
2020-03-04 Shidbi 61 view
Essays by user Shidbi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun difference seems to be countable; consider using: 'few differences'.
Suggestion: few differences
...her transportation modes and there is a few difference between these two. However, the bicycle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, third, well, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91052631579 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62148062454 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515789473684 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9748193437 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198530937102 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114627409654 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128180458486 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141012511079 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534560510096 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.