The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below

Essay topics:

The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

The bar charts illustrates that how many Japanese tourists are travelling overseas from 1985 to 1995 and the graphs represents the percentage of Australian people visited in japan. In bar chart units are measured in millions.
Overall, both charts are fluctuated in this entire period. Where The highest number of Japanese travelled abroad in 1995 but the maximum portion the Australian people reached in japan in 1993.
In terms of Japanese tourist , the chart was rising from 1985 to 1990. The least amount of people went to abroad in 1985 (approximately 5 millions) and in 1990 it was increased more than doubled around 11.5 millions. Suddenly in 1991 the graph was slightly decreased (11 millions) and then again it was going to upward direction and the year 1995 more than 15 millions Japanese went to overseas trips. From 1992 to 1993 no significant changed was noticed in the chart ( 11.9 millions and 12 millions respectively).
On the other hand, In 1985 only 2% Australian people travelled in japan after that it was increasing ad in 1988 around 4.8% people were going to japan tour. From 1988 to 1989 , there was a declining in the graph and in 1989 the percentage was almost 4.2%. The graph went higher until 1993 and in 1994 the percentage was dropped a little bit (6.5% and 6% respectively)

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-19 Guiseppe59192 view
2022-02-07 luckydough55 78 view
2022-02-07 luckydough55 73 view
2021-12-16 mnaufaln 61 view
2021-09-01 Audric view
Essays by user marufa_upoma :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The bar charts illustrates that how many Japanese tourists are tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n in 1993. In terms of Japanese tourist , the chart was rising from 1985 to 1990....
^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificant changed was noticed in the chart 11.9 millions and 12 millions respective...
^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e going to japan tour. From 1988 to 1989 , there was a declining in the graph and ...
^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3 and in 1994 the percentage was dropped a little bit 6.5% and 6% respectively ...
^^
Line 4, column 331, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...d in 1994 the percentage was dropped a little bit 6.5% and 6% respectively
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a little bit 6.5% and 6% respectively
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83408071749 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56173552282 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52466367713 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8473996593 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161195471261 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764633237254 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779393846104 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120971336506 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627869319534 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.