Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become positive and negative development?
Our life has been changed significantly by the development of Science and technology. Today, the method of interaction with people has changed because of technology. As every single thing in this world has pros and cons, the progress of technology has also affected our life in both ways.
In past days, people hardly communicate with their families who lived in distance places. The only way to know their conditions was sending letters and it was very time consuming. But nowadays there are lots of media like mobile phone, email, telephone etc through which we can easily contact them. Moreover, now we can see each other from seating different places through video call. All these things bring us more closed with one another and it helps relationships last over time and distance
In addition, Human can find more friends through social media. It also increased the community bonding. People from different countries can communicate with each other through facebook, twitter and other media and they can know their culture, traditions and also make strong their friendships.
.Though it has many advantages but is has also hampered our relations. Like, instead of passing quality time with our families, most of the time we are busy scrolling facebook or playing games in internet. So family bonding is declining because of it. Furthermore, it happens most of the time that we go on a hang out with our friends or parents in spite of talking to them or enjoying with them we are busy to take pictures or looking at our phones. These habits badly affect our relationships with people. Slowly, we become unsocial.
Development of technology is a blessing for us. It is totally dependent on us how we use it. Avoiding the bad sites we should always concentrate on the good sites. People should use technology to make their life better. Our relations cannot be harmed until we are getting addicted to it.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 67
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation Why is this the case What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become positive and negative development 78
- Illiteracy continues to be a concern for many countries in the world today What are the causes of illiteracy in the modern world and what ef ects does it have on the people concerned and on society as a whole 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and also make strong their friendships. .Though it has many advantages but is has...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Though
...d also make strong their friendships. .Though it has many advantages but is has also ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95638629283 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60254225547 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588785046729 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0262588794 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7619047619 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238644650791 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689505844471 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661571524639 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126207797943 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049468755738 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.