The charts below show the percentage of food budgets the average Australian family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.
The pie charts depicts how much proportion of expenditure was spend on food by Australian family from 1980 to 2010. While, the line graph compares the fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants on basis of food consumed by people during 1970-2010.
Overall, In the initial period majority people prefer to eat homemade food whereas at the end of the time more than half of the Australian population increased their money limit on restaurant food. interestingly, the fast food restaurants was the most popular among the people in comparison with sit-down restaurants.
To commence with, in 1980, the budget on restaurant meals was very limited up to 15 percent which, after ten years, was rise to more than double (35 percent). Furthermore, in 2000, the money spend on restaurants food items and home cooked food was level off. After one decade (2010), there was only slightly increase in budgets on outside food with the figures by 10 percent to reach 60 percent.
Secondly, the regular restaurant food items and fast food meals were equally popular with 20 number of meals per annum but after 10 years the sit-down restaurants slightly outraced the fast food restaurants the former with 35 meals and latter one with 30 meals per year. However, the table tunes, during 1970-2010, the fast food restaurants encounter significantly rose in meal consumption to reach at the peak (nearly 120 meals/per year) whereas the sit down restaurants also experience rise but not in great number.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-30 | sharad patel | 87 | view |
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey 61
- Some people think that should start study at there early age other think that the children should start their study at age seven 56
- The graph shows data on the manufacture of passenger cars in 2015
- Tourism has increased so much over the last 50 years that it is having a mainly negative impact on local inhabitants and the environment However others claim that it is good for the economy Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of tourism and give your 73
- The charts below show the percentage of food budgets the average Australian family spent on restaurant meals in different years The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
... how much proportion of expenditure was spend on food by Australian family from 1980 ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od consumed by people during 1970-2010. Overall, In the initial period majority ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncreased their money limit on restaurant food. interestingly, the fast food resta...
^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Interestingly
... their money limit on restaurant food. interestingly, the fast food restaurants was the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...interestingly, the fast food restaurants was the most popular among the people ...
^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estingly, the fast food restaurants was the most popular among the people in co...
^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gly, the fast food restaurants was the most popular among the people in compari...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t popular among the people in comparison with sit-down restaurants. To commence ...
^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'restaurants'' or 'restaurant's'?
Suggestion: restaurants'; restaurant's
...urthermore, in 2000, the money spend on restaurants food items and home cooked food was lev...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... level off. After one decade 2010, there was only slightly increase in budgets on...
^^
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with the figures by 10 percent to reach 60 percent. Secondly, the regular res...
^^
Line 6, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r significantly rose in meal consumption to reach at the peak nearly 120 meals/pe...
^^
Line 6, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e peak nearly 120 meals/per year whereas the sit down restaurants also experience...
^^
Line 6, column 448, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...peak nearly 120 meals/per year whereas the sit down restaurants also experience rise b...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperience rise but not in great number.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07346938776 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66782704172 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555102040816 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.8736958879 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.111111111 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460390183863 0.215688989381 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212639154949 0.103423049105 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112118696 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294871002639 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10340869677 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.