The given illustrations provide information about the amount of time that two age groups spend on different internet activities in their leisure time. As can be seen in the diagrams young people from 18 to 26 years spend most of their time social networking and accessing music or films, while seniors from 60 to 70 years prefer researching, for example on health data and making bookings for instance on cinema or travel.
The supplied data clearly shows that a large number of young people select social networking and accessing music or films on internet with around a one quarter and 21 per cent respectively. Besides that, researching and playing games are also significantly popular among youngsters. It is interesting to note, that only 5 per cent spend time making bookings and 12 per cent making purchases.
As is presented in the second chart, seniors who are aged from 60 to 70, most of their time spend on researching and making bookings with 26 and 29 per cent respectively. It is worth noticing, that playing games are not as popular as social networking, although there is only 2 per cent distinction among them. Furthermore, the percentage of making purchases is almost equal as accessing music or films.
In general, younger adults would rather spend their free time social networking or accessing music or films, than making bookings, while elder person prefer researching and making bookings.
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 84
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 56
- The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time excluding email Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy in the Uk 2000 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... The supplied data clearly shows that a large number of young people select social networking a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07264957265 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74632089745 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534188034188 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1789444775 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.888888889 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237131564521 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101637854475 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727480460228 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153904945546 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03433495428 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.