The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of different water applications in six countries.
In general, the main purpose of agricultural use is all asia and south america area. Overall, north america and europe aims on industrial use area.
In africa, central asia, south east asia and south america, there are 84%, 88%, 81% and 71% respectively for agricultural purpose, which is much better than the other aims such as industrial and domestic. On domestic use, south america is the biggest proportion compared with the other countries, with 19%, for the smallest proportion, central asia and south east asia are just 7% independently on this area.
For north america and europe, we can see that the proportion of industrial use is the biggest significantly, at 48% and 53%, higher than 39% and 32% of agricultural use. However, in south america, africa and central asia, industrial use is the lowest proportion around 10%, 7% and 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | kaka singh | 67 | view |
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12337662338 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84499335353 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6226386498 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13350190222 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860585463777 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541454734896 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111336427093 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525417627478 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.