The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the amount of water utilization based on three criteria(industrial, agricultural, domestic) in six different regions of the earth(North America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia, South East Asia).
Agricultural usage of water dictates the chart for almost all the regions except North America and Europe. Whereas, Central Asia shows the highest water usage with an impressive 88% of total usage, which is the largest percentage of water usage of any kind among all the regions.
Domestic and industrial usage remain relatively similar for both Africa and Central Asia. Although, for both of these regions domestic usage exceeds industrial usages by 2%. Whereas, in North America, Europe and South East Asia, industrial usage of water is higher than that of domestic usage. Furthermore, industrial water utilization even crosses the agricultural usage of water for North America and Europe. However, South America shows increased domestic usage of water which betters the industrial usage by 9% from 10% to 19%.
To conclude, Africa, Central Asia, South East Asia and South America represent a higher utilization of water for agricultural purposes. On the contrary, industrial usage clinched the top place in both North America and Europe.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56994818653 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80279752708 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476683937824 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8312040517 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107112301623 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581401476452 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331543324046 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822734650558 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302768199862 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.