Some children find learning history at school very exciting, but many others think it is very boring. In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children?
History plays a vital role in providing young people with necessary information about their country, culture, evolution of human civilization and many more. Yet, majority of the children in school find it tedious to learn history. Hence, a revolution in teaching methods will be needed to revitalise the interest in children about history. The following passages will explain some prospective effective teaching techniques.
Firstly, we all know that, children love to watch cartoon. Thus, we can offer them cartoons based on historical events or facts. In this way, children can both learn history and have fun simultaneously. Not only that, children can also be introduced to story books, containing graphical characters from the history. Even, fun home works explaining this story books can also boost the enthusiasm in learning history.
Secondly, collection of different group activities will also be an effective way of teaching children history. For example, organizing small plays with children based on historical events can help them learn history indirectly. In addition to that, frequent study tours will offer these children a more direct way of learning the past without even acknowledging it.
In conclusion, there is no doubt about importance of history lessons for the children. But to make it more enjoyable for future prospects of the nation, some changes has to the introduced in the teaching methodology. Unfortunately, there is no single solution to this problem. But, a combination of informational cartoons, historical story books, plays and study tours can provide this young people with indirect access to historical information.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55294117647 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91962298683 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5340566753 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278982945756 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976328646983 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724956594173 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17265051579 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385371010283 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.