The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas in the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
There are six charts that clearly represent the differentiation of six world regions' purpose on using water. Generally, between those six areas, four of them have a big share of agriculture reason rather than two sectors, industrial use, and domestic use.
Agriculture purpose dominantly occurs on 4 regions, South America, Africa, Central Asia, South East Asia. They consume water more than 70 % on farming activities. Otherwise, the quarter of share happens in industries and Domestics. Both of them, Africa and Central Asia, exploit water less than 10 % for both purposes. Meanwhile, two other areas, South America and South East Asia, do not consume water far from 20% for two respected reasons.
The rest of the two Areas, North America and Europe, spend much of their water resources on Industrial use. They spend water above 40%, 48 % happens in North America, and 53% occur in Europe. Meanwhile, Two other sectors, more than a quarter they spend water on Agriculture, and less than 16% on Domestic purpose, 13 %, and 15% respectively.
- Nowadays information is freely available on internet therefore is no longer need for museum To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in the three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17159763314 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65659608456 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591715976331 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2111280166 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13700324776 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645441997766 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739873727392 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109107610899 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677315066554 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.