The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given charts illustrate the distribution of Britain bachelors who spoke other than English in 2000 and 2010. In general, it seems that the population of British-bilingual students were more likely increased in three major languages, French, Spanish, and another language. However, Students who spoke in two other languages and French had not precisely developed as weel as one literal population, who spoke no other than English.
French, Spanish, and another language had obviously lightened up to 5% within ten years. In 2000, French spotted at 10 %, followed by another language that got 15%, then Spanish situated at 30%. Fortunately, those three additional languages had risen 5%; 15% , 20%, 35% respectively.
Contrarily, German additional language spotted at the same place, 10%, in 2000 and 2010. In another hand, the British students who spoke French had slightly plummeted to 5%, from 15% in 2000 to 10% in 2010. As result increasing bilingual population, one literal population dropped within ten years, it gained 20% in 2000 but decreased 10% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- the diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 60
- The chart below shows different levels of post-school qualification in Australia and the proportions of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior. Others disagree and think that local host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and gives your opinion. 73
- 'Failure id proof that the desire wasn't strong enough'To what extent do you agree with this statement? give reasons for your answer. 61
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e additional languages had risen 5%; 15% , 20%, 35% respectively. Contrarily, Ge...
^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 20% in 2000 but decreased 10% in 2010.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30588235294 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8688429026 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605882352941 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5174467664 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247549011107 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113119687013 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533845885983 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174017468656 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535283089243 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.