The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided pie charts depict the statistical data on different reasons of water usage in six particular areas in the world.
Overall, it is evident that majority of the areas utilize most of their water resources for agricultural purpose except for North America and Europe where it is mostly used for industries.
To begin with, North America and Europe make use of nearly half of their water resources for industrial purpose, whereas other nations namely regions namely South America, Africa, Central Asia and Southeast Asia do not deploy much on this purpose, that is ranging from 5% to 12%. For agricultural use, other than North America and Europe, the remaining four zones spend an average of 70% of their water resources.
Proceeding ahead, the least motive of water usage is domestic use, South America utilizes 19% of its water resources for household grounds and smallest proportion is spent by Central Asia and Southeast Asia reported for 7% each. Other regions lie in the aforementioned range which is 7% to 19%.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The charts below show the proportion of holidaymakers using four different types of accommodations in three different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- Some experts believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, except for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09411764706 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53667902669 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6957487328 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221353643044 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113487851533 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724335866541 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15158524515 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504453217801 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.