The chart compares the proportion of citizens living alone in 5 age groups from 17 to 64 years old in America during a 150 – year period since 1850.
Overall, the figure for people living alone increased gradually through the period surveyed in all age groups and that for people aged 55 – 64 was generally the highest. Units are measured in percentages.
In 1850, figures of three age groups were given. Only around 2% of people aged 37 – 46 and those aged 47 - 54 lived alone, approximately 1% lower compared to those aged 55 – 64. During the next 50 years, in 1900, the proportion of citizens living alone from 27 – 36 years old contributed just above 2%, while that in 37 – 46 category remained unchanged. There was a slight increase of approximately 1% and 2% in 47 – 54 and 55 – 64 age groups respectively.
A new pattern, people aged 17 – 26, emerged in 1950, with the percentage of those living alone in all ages went up sharply. However, 2000 saw a significant increase in the proportion of citizens living alone. The percentage of those living alone in 37 – 46 age group was followed by those aged 27 – 36, stood at 7% and 8%, respectively, ahead of the 17 – 26 category with just 5%. The figure for 47 – 54 years old group was almost 4 times higher than that in 1950, at 13%; whereas that for 55 – 64 age group nearly doubled to reach the high peak at 17%.
- The process shows diamonds moving from the mine to the retailer 85
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 94
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 84
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...ed just above 2%, while that in 37 – 46 category remained unchanged. There was a slight ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
... 8%, respectively, ahead of the 17 – 26 category with just 5%. The figure for 47 – 54 ye...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38697318008 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48561211444 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486590038314 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7800119202 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295038878529 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130843053998 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068775266636 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206768554378 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167252770826 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.