The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers Summarize the information by select

Given are the bar charts contrasting give information regard the service of a bus company in the years between 1999 and 2003.
It is perceptible one of the charts compares the target and the actual performance of the company is buses in term of timeliness. The other chart details the number of complaints sent to the company by its passengers during the same period.
More speccifically, in terms of its ability to be on time, 2000 was the year when this company failed to meet their target the most, with a 4 percent difference between target and actual performance. Much smaller difference were seen in the years 1999, 2001, and 2002, with buses missing just 1 percent of their target for those years. However, it is notable that in the last year, 2003 the company actually exceeded its target by a small margin. With regard to passenger satisfaction, one of the notable trends is that, during the period studied, the number of complaints was increasing for all but for one year. In 2001 was noteworthy because the number of complaints actually fell from 100 to 90 per thousand that year.
From then on, however, the number continued its increasing trend, peaking at 120 complaints per thousand passengers by the end of 2003.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar charts contrasting give informa...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, then, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81132075472 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63862713368 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542452830189 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2283457924 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295091957937 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140742505676 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824902687349 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188270239224 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105721581213 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.