Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions diverge on whether spoken communication plays more vitally than written communication. Although formidably censures this sentiment, I ascertain that this statement is right owing to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, interaction by voice has many beneficial impacts on our daily lives. This can be explained by the fact that listeners through the attitude, emotion or body language of speakers can clearly understand ideas that speakers want to convey to them. Moreover, we are able to seize various opportunities to be friends with strangers instead of gaining merely several chances due to utilizing written conversation methods. For instance, when I become a new staff member in the company - in a completely new environment, to me there are many strangers who I have never seen and spoken with. Thanks to face-to-face conversation with them day by day by listening to their opinions, observing their emotion and real reaction, I naturally built close bond friendships for myself with colleagues.
Last but not least, spoken interaction brings for us a large number of soft skills such as critical thinking and leadership. For example, politicians must train hard to possess eloquent speeches as well as appropriate gestures for successful public speaking to be able to gain back support or love from everyone. Hence, face-to-face communication speeds up work procedures which could otherwise take ages if delivered by written documents. Most meetings, in particular, involve verbal discussions so that ideas can be exchanged constantly and therefore quickly reach final decisions.
All in all, although each way of communication has its own benefits, I think verbal communication is still much better and more powerful than written communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-19 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | aghil90 | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-17 | thuhuongkbc | view | |
| 2020-02-17 | thuhuongkbc | view |
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the changes in an Art Centre from 2010 to today 89
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The picture shows the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 640, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'day by'.
Suggestion: day by
... to face-to-face conversation with them day by day by listening to their opinions, observing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lf with colleagues. Last but not least, spoken interaction brings for us a large...
^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...east, spoken interaction brings for us a large number of soft skills such as critical thinking a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in particular, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 965.302439024 155% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52962962963 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1067744079 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 106.607317073 178% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703703703704 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 283.868780488 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7385374009 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182787643007 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667940975387 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988302908978 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143958665583 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101951282114 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 40.7170731707 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.