The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality, both actual and target (what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve), and the number of complaints and passengers.
The first chart illustrates the real percentage buses of a particular concern that arrived at the destination on time compared to the target of that firm, between 1999 and 2003. Meanwhile, the second depicts how many gravamens were sent during the same period.
It is clear that the actual and target proportion of buses coming punctually decreased over the years while the number of complaints from their customer went up throughout the period.
According to the first bar chart, in 1999, the company's target of buses reaching on time stood at 86%, which was slightly higher 1% than what was actually achieved. Although the goal remained unchanged one year later, the number of buses followed exactly on the schedule dropped by 3%. In the last year of the report, this company had gone down its target on-time arrivals to over 84%, whilst the actual figure was received a growth but it was still lower than itself in the first year.
As can be seen from the second chart, starting at around 7% of total passengers in 1999. After that, the number of complaints made by passengers rose significantly before experiencing a little fall to just over 8% in 2001. This data then grew considerably two years later, with almost 12% of passengers complaining in the final period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89861751152 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52423535081 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635944700461 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4074922768 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243563852383 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875857897952 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726787539189 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128459296753 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635809975752 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.