The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cites, Derby and Notngham, between 2000 and 2009
The bar chart compares two different municipalities, namely Derby and Nottingham, in terms of how many apartments constructed from 2000 to 2009.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that both sets of figures for Derby and Nottingham witnessed an upward trend over the ten years period. However, while the number of houses built each year in Derby either increased or stayed the same, the data for Nottingham saw greater fluctuations.
In 2000, the amount of newly built homes in Derby was just under 50 and steadily rose over the next three years to reach around 125 apartments in 2003. The figure then remained the same for the next four years before dramatically elevating to over 250 in 2008 and hit the highest point of approximately 340 in 2009.
Regarding Derby, the quantity of created houses in Nottingham followed a rather different pattern. Between 2000 and 2005, the data oscillated around 50, before dropping to almost 0 in 2006. Over the three years ensuing, nearly 200 homes manufactured in 2007 and roughly 250 in 2009 after decreasing again to about 10 houses in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-02 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 89
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes from three di erent sources between 1990 and 2005 89
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 73
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94594594595 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66571446355 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643243243243 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8985441341 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271914799527 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108013764351 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590991141065 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15934802767 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389175603385 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.