The charts below show the proportion of expenditure by students on average at one university in 2000 and 2010
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;
line-height:107%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">The two pie charts demonstrate how students of a university spend money on average in the years
2000 and 2010. Overall, the proportions of utilization on food and drink were
not change (29%) and also the highest ratio both surveyed years. Whereas, the
percentages of holidays remained the lowest (5%).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;
line-height:107%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> Eating out accounted for 4% of the
expenditure in 2000, and experienced twofold increase to 8% in 2010. Utilities
on electricity or water was 21% in 2000 and grew significantly by 6% in 2010.
At the beginning of the period, transport made up 8%, and this figure rose
slightly to 9% in 2010.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;
line-height:107%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> Clothing, which comprised almost
one-fifth of spending in 2000, fell more than three times to 5% after 10-year
period. In contrast, distribution for sports and cultural sector remained
constantly in both years at 17%<o:p></o:p></span></p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-06 | chauanhyeudau | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | tegarangkasa | 96 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Dorisaim | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Dorisaim | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , serif&apos
...;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>The two pie charts demonstrate how stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'changed'.
Suggestion: changed
...utilization on food and drink were not change 29% and also the highest ratio both sur...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , serif&apos
...;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'> &n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , serif&apos
...;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'> &n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 8.73885350318 4.92477711251 177% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 11.5458681476 2.65546596893 435% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668789808917 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.45097560976 138% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 149.535298694 43.030603864 348% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 228.666666667 112.824112599 203% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 3.83414634146 417% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103353898663 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661022595981 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329110501789 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582640463079 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680532844138 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.8 13.2329268293 248% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 11.25 61.2550243902 18% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.2 10.3012195122 177% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 33.71 11.4140731707 295% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.