The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to in 2000 and 2010.
The given two pie charts illustrate that the number of UK students who could speak foreign languages except for mother tongue in the percentage of scale over the ten year period.
In general, it is immediately clear that Spanish is the major proportion, namely second language in the UK whereas the number of student speaking German is almost unpopular.
To begin with, there was a 5 percent rise between 2000 and 2010, which is the use of Spanish which was commonly spoken a second language by British students at the university. Unfortunately, the percentage of German has no fluctuation in the research period and their percent is the lowest among 3 different languages. There was a 5 percent increase in two other languages from 10 to 15 percent in 2000 and 2010 respectively. When it comes to French, due to decrease 5 percent, it became 10 percent in 2010. The ratio of only spoken English is as same as German flow, remained their percent at 20.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-04 | Ha su jeong | 79 | view |
- Some people beliebe that it is good to share to as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. discuss both these views an 89
- Write a report for university lecturer describing the information in the two graphs below 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 46
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie chart below shows the results of a survey of the causes of poor learning outcomes in schools in a particular country in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 42
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, whereas, except for, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77710843373 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70296713897 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3062284102 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195715945049 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852061596141 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579958178137 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12205081576 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211743104226 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.