The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998,2000,2002 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant.
The given column graph depicts the variations in the places where folk accessed the internet between 1998 and 2004.
Overall, it can be seen from the graph that more people surfed the internet at home. While people used the least internet in library.
In terms of internet access, the highest proportion of folk used net surfing at home, which constituted just over a half (55%) in 1998. This ratio was almost fifth for librarian internet users compare with home user. Yet, Scenario was same but trend became invert. The proportion for home user went a little under a half (48%). and librarians user increased to just under 20%. These trends continued till 2004 and ended with 55% for home and the ratios, almost 16%, for worker and librarians in 2004 were same.
On contrary,second and third places for surfing were work offices and colleges. Workers who surfed internet were higher compare with college goers. In 1998 and 2002, number of internet user were same at office and college which made up just over a quarter and 20% respectively. Internet users in 2002 at education place and working place were approximately at a quarter. In 2004, number of student internet users (around 15%) were dominated workers, which was more than 15%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-10 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-29 | Ajantha J | view | |
| 2018-11-03 | Singh-saab | 77 | view |
| 2020-05-27 | Hường Nguyễn8 | 44 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 61
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects shouldn't worry about producing building as a work of art. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 91
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features ,and make comparisons where relevant. 25
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books bought over the internet Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ore people surfed the internet at home. While people used the least internet in libra...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...me user went a little under a half 48%. and librarians user increased to just under...
^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...55% for home and the ratios, almost 16%, for worker and librarians in 2004 were s...
^^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , second
...arians in 2004 were same. On contrary,second and third places for surfing were work ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91428571429 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36815608973 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4571462075 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.7142857143 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07142857143 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185248376821 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743905873293 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632864825495 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149552590706 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638961461071 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.