The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso

The given pie charts compare ability to speak different languages than english of students from perticular university in britain in years 2000 and 2010. The units are measured in percentage.
Overall, what stands out from the graphs is that german remained most famous langeage in both mentioned years and after a 10 years, the level of mono-lingual had been halved.
Regarding the figures of 2000, the paramount value is 30%, which was taken by the Spanish langeage. Following them, 20% of pupils were communicate only in english language. Next to them the similar amount was noticed as 15% and 10%, in which former is the scale of French and Another language while latter is German and bilingual learneres.
After a decade, again the most popular one was spanish language with the increment of 5% and with this same proportion Another language group and Two language portion surged from 15 to 20% and 10 to 15% respectively. Remaining all languages noticed a unchange conditon and moderate decline; where, German have no change as compare to the 2000, and after the downfall, new magnitudes of undergraduates who did not have knowledge of other language and French knowing students were 10% each.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'communicated'.
Suggestion: communicated
...age. Following them, 20% of pupils were communicate only in english language. Next to them ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tively. Remaining all languages noticed a unchange conditon and moderate decline;...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04020100503 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61996576323 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628140703518 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8522790174 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173784855797 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069195279425 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704242794986 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101080895798 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766055050627 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.