The charts below show the proportions of British Students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010.
The two pie charts illustrate comparison between university students in Britian regarding ability to speak foriegn language in the year 2000 and 2010.
Overall, it is patent from the charts that students are more involved in speaking language other then their mother tongue in these ten years. Similarly, popularity of languages other than three of the European languages (French, German and Spanish) have increased in this period.
With regard of number of languages each British students knew, the students who knew two more languages other than three mentioned above were 10% of them in 2000 and this percentage figure increased to 15% in 2010. Students speaking only single language have witnessed considerable nosedive as more then half of the total used to speak single language in 2000 ;however, in 2010, less than one third students speak single foriegn language now.
Among the students surveyed, the language which was spoken most by English graduate students was Spanich only where one fifth of them spoke the language; however, this figure dropped to half (10%) in 2010, making this proportion equal to French and German speaking group. Meanwhile, students, speaking language other than aforementioned European languages, increased by 5% in 2010 from 15% a decade back.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: OTHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'other than'?
Suggestion: other than
... are more involved in speaking language other then their mother tongue in these ten years....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...ore involved in speaking language other then their mother tongue in these ten years....
^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...witnessed considerable nosedive as more then half of the total used to speak single ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32512315271 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51791127947 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.747071897 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.428571429 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363819260103 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177564810688 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520774250647 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230047504599 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048069588317 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.