The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the usa since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The line graph illustrates how USA utilized 6 different sources of energy from the year 1980 ,and will be used in future till the year 2030. The energy consumption is calibrated in quadrillion units.
Overall, non-renewable energy sources, such as petrol, coal and natural gases, dominated the previous consumption pattern; however, other form of energy were least preferred by the country. This trend is projected to continue in next two decades.
Being most preferred fuel in USA during the period, petrol and oil was consumed approximately 35 quadrillion units of energy which accounted for less than double of the second positioned, natural gas, in the begining of the period. Although the figure flucturated in subtle way for three aforementioned non-renewable sources of energy, these value proliferated for many years. However, for renewable sources such as nuclear, solar and water, they have remained less than 10 units in these period. Among the three sources, at early year of the survey, solar/wind remained least popular fuel while in rest of the year along with the projection hydropower remained in last position in this regard. Most of above mentioned trends are predicted to be continued till 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ent sources of energy from the year 1980 ,and will be used in future till the year...
^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'remained the least'.
Suggestion: remained the least
...at early year of the survey, solar/wind remained least popular fuel while in rest of the year ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28865979381 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79092177256 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628865979381 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1783357926 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152759261705 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644744957361 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056234550672 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125679921762 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717886774075 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.