The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari

The pie chart illustrates information about the percentages of British students in England those who were capable of speaking different languages besides to English in 2000 and 2010.

To begin with, it can be clearly understood that, Spanish was the most popular second language spoken by students in that university in both the years 2000 and 2010. The proportion of speaking English and Spanish increased slightly from 30% to 35%. Furthermore, the percentage of speaking another language and two other languages rose by 20% and 15% respectively while German remained constant at 10%.

To continue with, when it comes to the proportion of speaking French, there was a fall from 20% to 10% between 2000 and 2010, and also no -other languages' percentage dropped 5%.
In conclusion, it is understood from the given chart in an English university between 2000 and 2010 is able to speak additional languages, there are substantial variances, whereas there are more English and Spanish speakers, the opposite is correct for French and German speakers.

In conclusion, it is understood from the given chart in an English university between 2000 and 2010 is able to speak additional languages, there are some variances, whereas there are more English and Spanish speakers, the opposite is correct for French and German speakers.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, second, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25352112676 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77521581694 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478873239437 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.257771705 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.857142857 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 5.23603664747 240% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335698138398 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171035462229 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757582527532 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209749042068 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699771667543 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.