The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The pie charts illustrate the ratio of British pupils how speak more than native language in a university which is located in England in 2000 and 2010.
Overall, in 2000 the majority of students on spoke their Spanish and small proportion able talk in two other languages, while after a decade, the number of students was increased whoe only able speak Spanish and decreased the count of student who speak only english adn French.
The graph clearly shows that 30% student who able talk in Spanish in 2000 and next ten years the number was only 5% grow. The ratio of German and those student able to spoke two other languages was equal in 2000, each 10%. However, rhe number of student had same both time how spoke German while the count was climbed 5% those how sopke more than two language. French and more than one language spoken student has equal proportion 15% in 2000, however French spoken was reduced 5% and two languages spoken was increased 5%. The significan downfall in happened with those student who on spoke one language, from 20% to 10% in 2010.
- The bar chart below illustrates five different industries percentage share of Brazil s economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029 73
- Few people devote time to hobbies nowadays Say why you think this is the case and what effect this has on the individual and society in general 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 67
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss Both views and give your opinion 61
- Plagiarism in academics has become a pressing problem in many countries today What are the causes of this problem What are some possible solutions 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this student' or 'those students'?
Suggestion: this student; those students
...s only 5% grow. The ratio of German and those student able to spoke two other languages was e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e two other languages was equal in 2000, each 10%. However, rhe number of student...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this how' or 'those hows'?
Suggestion: this how; those hows
...e German while the count was climbed 5% those how sopke more than two language. French an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...guage. French and more than one language spoken student has equal proportion 15% ...
^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this student' or 'those students'?
Suggestion: this student; those students
...he significan downfall in happened with those student who on spoke one language, from 20% to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66489361702 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15998712125 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6017177829 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34027220728 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163948276616 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749401024152 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244188980609 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214014672622 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.