Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
In recent years, the trend has been changed towards met each other. Nowadays most of the social meetings and gatherings are transferred to the new way of communication with the help of technology. in the course of the essay, I will describe how people are influenced by new relationships by the modern way of technology, and discuss the negative effects on humans.
The internet has been changed our way of life and most of the things in our life's shifted on the internet. one main thing that moved on the internet, our new friends. In our most of the time we spent on the internet and where we have the power to get in touch from anywhere from the world. Before the Internet, most of our relations a limited distance and we do not have many choices to pick a friend with peers of thought. Now, we have social websites and on that websites, there are many filters that we can apply and we find a friend anywhere from the who have the same thought or similar profession. However, it can minimise distance but we are losing our close blood relations.
Before these social sites, we spent our time with our family and friend although we do not spend much with our friends, we spent quality time. These are people who are involved in over happiness and in the worse time. In addition, these are longe term relationships. But this social site destroys all of this and now we spent our time internet friends while these most of these friendships or relations for short terms. we entertain ourselves also from the internet.
In conclusion, these technologies give us to access all over the world and minimise the distances however it comes with some serious negatives that decrease our blood relations.
- It is increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 67
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world 20
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...munication with the help of technology. in the course of the essay, I will describ...
^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...s in our lifes shifted on the internet. one main thing that moved on the internet, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...iendships or relations for short terms. we entertain ourselves also from the inter...
^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ives that decrease our blood relations.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51981260326 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496666666667 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.429603662 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127172289518 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497038208452 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494968128076 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101288490259 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749898016365 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.