The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare how many students in college's England can used both English and other different languages between 2000 and 2010.
Overrall, it is clear that the number of students have just spoken only English have largest percentage in both years. In contrast, the proportion of students could speak addition Germany was lowest and remain the sảm percentage in 2000 and 2010.
As can be seen from the pie charts, the proportion of Bristish students cannot use other language accounted for biggest number in both years, at 30% in 2000 and 35 % in 2010. The number students spoke two others languages was smallest, at one-tens of the total in 2000, but this figure increased to 15% in 2010. There was also went up in the percentage of students use another language, at 15% in 2000 to one-fifths in the second years.
The proportion of students spoke only German made up 10 % and remained the same in 2010, wherease the number of students spoke French and Spanish witnessed an decresed from 15% and 20%, respectively in 2000 to the similar percenatge at 10% in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the largest'.
Suggestion: have the largest
... students have just spoken only English have largest percentage in both years. In contrast, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ents spoke French and Spanish witnessed an decresed from 15% and 20%, respectively...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81081081081 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.493940152 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6179036824 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277788465992 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148066552513 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544292753357 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179024032201 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04192312906 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.