The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The diagrams above representate the number of students who could create a conversation in different languages in the one of university at England. It was measured in percentage. Overall, some numbers in several languages were rose dramatically in the same amount while another part dropped sharply.
According to the data in 2000, students who only spoke Spanish were included more than a quarter of the chart exactly 30% whereas no other language reached less than it, definitely 20%. In the other hand, the same number stood at those who only could speak French and another language continued by students who only spoke German and two other language, consecutively 15% and 10%.
Then in 2010, the highest rise was 5% occupied by four groups of language involve the students who talked french, spanish, another language, and two other languages, which were counted from the number in 2000. The percentage of no other language fell a half to 10%, instead two other languages remained constant at 10%.
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor 61
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 67
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia 78
- The maps below represent the development in the Norbiton in the future 11
- Police budget 2017 2018 and how the money was spent 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61523403079 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4100894212 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331936377573 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144932404339 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801631903091 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22374709611 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166896971949 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.