The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts depict six languages usage ability rate apart from English among British pupils in two different periods.
Overall, it is evident that in both years, students in Britain were typically monolingual. Another notable feature is that by comparing the proportions between 2000 and 2010, it can also be seen that the figures of students who can spoke French, German or two other languages shared an almost indentical distribution pattern.
Upon closer analysis, the largest segment among the percentages, comprising solely 30%, are British university attendees who lack of the ability to communicate with any languages besides English. One striking feature is that the rate of people who can speak Spanish and another language rank second with a total of 20% in 2000 and 2010, respectively. Additionally, the percentage of students who were bilingual or capable of speaking French or German are evenly allocated, with either French speaking capability rate was the highest in 2000 or a rise in people who can spoke two languages in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | wbj | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-21 | nguyenthanhloc | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-07 | Behnaz.babayani | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | Wulan | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, second, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26627218935 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73796387903 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621301775148 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.2506790082 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.333333333 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280202623646 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131811779854 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406738608885 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171348713091 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570956643599 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.