The Pie Charts illustrate the information about the percentages of Scholars from Britain at an English University in England who were able to speak multifarious kind of languages along with English into different years 2000 and 2010. Units are measured in percentages.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that in both years an overwhelming majority of students preferred to speak in Spanish only.
It is interesting to note that, in 2000, 30 percent of the students were able to speak Spanish which then increased by 5% over the period. In the given year 20% of students were not able to speak any other language other than English whereas, in 2010, the proportion of scholars speaking other languages decreased to 10 percent. Furthermore, a small minority of students enjoyed speaking French only in the year 2000 then the percentage of students speaking French decrease to 10% in 2010.
In contrast, only 10% of students liked to speak German at the University in both years. Moreover, 15% of Scholars were able to speak another language along with English in 2000 whereas, the figures of students speaking other language increased slightly and reached to 20% in the given year 2010. In addition, a small minority of students enjoyed speaking to other languages in England in 2000 and over the period the number of students speaking to other languages increased to 15%.
- Some schools start teaching a foreign language in primary school years. Do advantages of teaching languages to young children outweigh the disadvantages? Give your own opinion and examples. 85
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 67
- Some schools start teaching a foreign language in primary school years Do advantages of teaching languages to young children outweigh the disadvantages Give your own opinion and examples 59
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, then, whereas, in addition, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04385964912 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69338244929 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456140350877 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8326775748 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.777777778 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375485083359 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172250617069 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101908222369 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236579670245 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107259162113 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.