The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010.

The pie charts provide information about the percentage of pupils of a university of Britain who could speak other language apart from English for the year 2000 and 2010.

First of all, Spanish was the language which was spoken the most in both the years and its usage increased by 5% (35% in 2010).the children who were multilingual and the ones who were speaking other languages also increased by 5% and their figures were 15% and 20% respectively.

On the other hand, the use of two languages decreased. Amongst which, the pupils who were monolingual became half (10%) and this figure was identical to French language which decreased as well. Interestingly, the use of German remained the same in both the years at one-tenth.

Overall, the proportion of British students who knew two or more language increase in 2010 compared with 2000. Also, the percentage of students who were able to speak Spanish were more than others.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-12 Tejas Dalwadi 61 view
2019-11-12 Tejas Dalwadi 61 view
Essays by user Jocelyn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie charts provide information about the...
^^
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vide information about the percentage of pupils of a university of Britain who co...
^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which decreased as well. Interestingly, the use of German remained the same in b...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, well, apart from, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94267515924 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61571814596 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1065430022 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387543510656 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165089334073 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737940333968 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226166560275 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600555038717 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.