The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
The pie charts compares how many percentage of distinct causes that affect decision of commuters in driving and cycling to work.
Overall, most people prefer cycling for their health and avoiding air pollution, while the rate of people prefers driving to work because of the comfort.
Look at the chart for more detail, we can see that the rate of people who pay more attention to their health and environmental pollution when they choose cycling to work is both 30%. This share is as twice as much as that of people who decide to cycling to work for parking problems, at 15%. The reasons of cost and speed in cycling choice account for a minority of roughly 12%.
In terms of driving to work, most people prefer its comfort, holding the lion’s share at 40%, which is nearly twice as much as that of reasons of distance, at 21%. In addition, the rate of reasons, including safety, carrying and speed, constitutes at 11%, 14%,14%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | faisal420 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | dlswife | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Bao Linh Le | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | BangLangTim | 56 | view |
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. 84
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and cultures. Others think it's not necessary. Discuss both views. 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 73
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four differentseasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
The pie charts compares how many percentage of distinct causes that affect decision...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cycle'.
Suggestion: to cycle
...nvironmental pollution when they choose cycling to work is both 30%. This share is as t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78181818182 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48665123076 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1533316267 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166657760742 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803700516647 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374212570767 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104207857855 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189366417359 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.