The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010.
The pie graphs describe the different between the results of evaluation from Parkway Hotel’s customers in 2005 and 2010. Overall, the number of visitors, who rated satisfactory service, accounted for the highest percentage in 2005. Whereas, in 2010, the highest percentage was from who rated good service.
As can be seen from the drawings, there was 45 percent of customers who rated satisfactory service in 2005; after 5 years, it plummeted significantly by nearly 3 times. Fortunately, the amount of good reviews rose considerably from slightly over a tenth to almost 40 percent over the period.
Turning to the others, the number of visitors, who rated excellent service, stood at a lowest percentage in 2005 which was less by approximately a quarter than in 2010 (5 and 28 percent, respectively). furthermore, the amount of very poor reviews dropped sharply from 15 percent in 2005 to a tiny number in last year of the period.
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Some people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on earth. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Fashion trend are difficult to follow. Some people think that they primarily exist fust to sell clothes so we should not follow them. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015. 73
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding. 56
- Some people think that telling the trust is not always essential. It is necessary to tell lies sometime. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
..., who rated excellent service, stood at a lowest percentage in 2005 which was les...
^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...in 2010 5 and 28 percent, respectively. furthermore, the amount of very poor reviews droppe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11038961039 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98314967557 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6210969906 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190008703284 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987992365305 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626747301143 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133358340136 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070039719127 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.