The bar charts given illustrate the percentage of energy consumed in 2000 and 2006 in the United Kingdom and the United States of America.
Overall, non-renewable energy such as oil, coal, and gas accounted for a dominant proportion over the period. Meanwhile, nuclear power and other unlimited energy sources were not commonly used.
Regarding the energy consumption in 2000, the percentage of oil was the largest in both 2 countries, at 28% in the UK and 36% in the USA, followed by that of coal, at 29% and 34%. The figure for gas used was equal to half of the oil, about 20%, and 13% respectively in the UK and the USA. The two smallest proportions belonged to nuclear power and other renewable sources, lower than 15% in both two countries.
When it comes to 2006, there was a slight increase in the percentage of oil consumption, to 30% and 40% in the UK and the USA. Similarly, the figure for gas witnessed significant growth, accounting for 38% in the UK and 25 % in the USA. Due to these increases, the other energy was less commonly used in 2006 than in the past.
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- the graph below shows predictions about the numbers of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st in both 2 countries, at 28% in the UK and 36% in the USA, followed by that of ...
^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er energy was less commonly used in 2006 than in the past.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, similarly, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61658031088 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65393845221 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533678756477 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0545858827 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171036123861 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723075642659 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044066985098 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106294754401 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345548164091 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.