The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The supplied presentations demonstrate the consumption of energy in Great Britain and America, in two spans of time 2000 and 2006.

We can see that the oil is reported in the USA where it is the highest source of energy in both of time whereas other renewable sources are the least almost 7% in 2000 and less than 5% in 2006. Coal was about 35% before it dipped roughly to 25% in 2006. It is seen that gas slightly increased to 25% in 2006 than in 2000. The last source of energy which is called nuclear power decreased just over 5% than it was nearly 10%.

The figure for oil has not almost changed among time in the UK where the gas picked up in 2006. The energy consumption which was about 30%, then plummed 25% is coal. There is given data for nuclear power that steadily declined to 7 or 8 percent. The percentage of other renewable sources remained in both of time.

In summary, energy that is called gas is the highest in Britain. Figure for oil is the top in the USA.

Votes
Average: 4.8 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The supplied presentations demonstrate t...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in two spans of time 2000 and 2006. We can see that the oil is reported in t...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...just over 5% than it was nearly 10%. The figure for oil has not almost change...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the UK where the gas picked up in 2006. The energy consumption which was about 30%,...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le sources remained in both of time. In summary, energy that is called gas is...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32432432432 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25597817934 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8686668963 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.7272727273 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186048409586 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697811839945 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519887064171 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11856502266 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324879867984 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 13.2329268293 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.48 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.