The charts below show water use by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007.
The pie charts illustrate the amount of water used in five distinct fields in Australia between 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that almost water was allocated for the food industry in the period shown, despite the slight decline. In addition, while sectors relating to service and housing witnessed various levels of increase, the remaining categories experienced the opposite trend.
Turning into detail, in 1997, Food products utilized 48% of total water usage while this figure for the building industry accounted for only 5%. Ten years later, in 2007, there was a slight decrease in both industries, resulted in the number at 41% and just 2% respectively. Also, the same tendency happened to manufacture, which fell from 15% in 1997 to 11% in 2007.
Regards to other sectors, the amount of water used in the household made up 19%, outnumbering the service industry which reached 13% in 1997. However, in 2007, this figure for service rose to 25%, exceeding the volume of water for the household, which occupied 21%.
- The charts below show water use by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 78
- The line chart below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15 to 64 in employment between 2003 and 2009 72
- The two maps below show road acess to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out opinions of full time and part time students about its services Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 80
- The chart below shows the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000and 2010 with the projected sales for 2020 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06470588235 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5448298901 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641176470588 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.4081333926 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24044010437 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103930852341 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928170882491 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162589270035 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104988724493 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.