The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the bar charts which cast light on the activities of graduates and postgraduates who did not go into full-time jobs after leaving university in the UK in 2008. Overall, in most of the cases, the lettered preferred further study to other activities.
Taking a look at the bar charts, in terms of doing part time jobs, postgraduates were more active than graduates with 2533 and 17735 members respectively. Moreover, when it comes to unpaid jobs, the number of graduates was more gigantic than that of postgraduates (3500 v.s 345). Furthermore, being interested in continuing education, 29665 of graduates went for further study, whereas this figure for postgraduates was somewhere in the region of 2725. Last but no least, some of the educated were jobless, most of whom, 16235 members, belonged to graduates, while postgraduates constituted 1625 of the unemployed.
To sum up, most of the graduates and postgraduates decided to go for further study and the least had proclivity for voluntary jobs.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisolls where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisolls where relevant. 56
- The pie chart compares the percentage of commuters using for different types of transport in an European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second paragraph shows the green house gas emission which result from this energy use 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar charts which cast light on the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ok at the bar charts, in terms of doing part time jobs, postgraduates were more active th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the region of 2725. Last but no least, some of the educated were jobless, most of whom, 16...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, look, moreover, so, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17073170732 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00158593813 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65243902439 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2076845804 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191897457712 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885095847178 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120197769687 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147383087352 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1060804519 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.