The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The above table graph illustrates the amount of earnings which exports of one society have been obtained from 5 diverse groups in scale of billion dollars between the period of 2015 and 2016. The above table demonstrates the alteration in each category in 2016 compared with 2015.
Overall it is clear that the most profitable portions of exports were for petroleum products and engineered goods. Also, according to the table, it is obvious that although gems and jewellery part witnessed decrease payment in 2016 compared to the year before, other parts had increase.
In Figure one, the greatest amount of payment was obtained by selling petroleum products to foreign countries in two years with approximately 61, 63 billion in 2015 and 2016 respectively. In engineered goods, the country seemed to earn a good value with 55 billion in 2015 which was enlarged slightly to 61. Finally, exporting textiles propelled the society to make the least amount of money with 25 billion in the first year and 31 in the following one.
In figure two, the only group which was indicated to have a decrease was gems and jewellery which decline 5.18% in 2016 compared to the year before. While, some parts had a slight expansion such as 0.81% in agriculture products, textiles increased in its value by 15.24% which was the highest one in the whole table.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The charts below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 87
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 78
- The process details designs of a modern landfill for household waste 67
- In some countries children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, so, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93832599119 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56189274864 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559471365639 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1006694946 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275443381169 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128168541345 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104349349981 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170502216408 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10856215445 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.