The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart below illustrates one nation’s export revenue from a diversity of products during 2015 and 2016 and the table data presents the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Upon analyzing the data, it becomes evident that petroleum products and engineered goods generated most of the export income of this nation. In addition, despite contributing the smallest earnings, textiles experienced the greatest increase rate from 2015 to 2016.
In terms of revenue proportion during the two recorded years, this country earned the most money from exporting petroleum products and engineered goods, with the former category having slightly higher income (above 60 billion dollars in 2015 and nearly 65 billion dollars in 2016) than the latter one (above 55 billion dollars in 2015 and 60 billion dollars in the next year). Gems and jewellery ranked third which contributed to the national budget of above 40 billion dollars each year followed by agricultural products with above 30 billion dollars per year. Meanwhile, textiles made the smallest contribution to the national wealthy with 25 billion dollars in 2015 and reached the same level with agricultural goods at above 30 billion dollars.
Regarding to growth rate of each exported category from 2015 to 2016, it is noticeable that the least valued industry which was textile saw the greatest increase rate with 15.24% while petroleum products which was the largest income-generating source rose modestly by 3%. The engineered goods sector was ranked second with a growth rate of 8.5% and agricultural products seemed to stay stable with quite a small changing rate of 0.81% while there was a decreasing pattern of 5.18% in the revenue of gems and jewelry export.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 84
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Space exploration is a controversial topic Some people believe that resources should be invested in exploring space while others argue that this money could be better spent on more pressing problems on Earth such as poverty and climate change Discuss both 84
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantage outweigh disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, second, so, third, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 281.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26334519573 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62774701863 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505338078292 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.9383079606 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 184.875 112.824112599 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.125 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286443047962 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149251100456 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157322392648 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233656785334 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181622468299 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.2329268293 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.