Overall, it is clear that Petroleum Products contributed the most for Export Earnings during 2015 and 2016, while Textiles contributed the least. Furthermore, several percentage changes happened during that period, in all product categories.
In a detail, Export Earnings mostly are gained through exporting Petroleum Products, both in 2015 and 2016, in about 60 billion dollars and 62 billion dollars, respectively. Following Petroleum Products, export incomes come from selling Engineered goods to other countries, with the amount of roughly 56 billion dollars in 2015, and went up 8.5% to approximately 65% in 2016.
Meanwhile, Gems and Jewellery export incomes were in the third place for both 2015 and 2016, where the amount of earnings were around 45% in 2015, before decreased 5.18% to about 40%. After Gems and Jewellery, we can see that Agricultural Products contributed around 30% export earnings in 2015, and rose slightly to approximately 31% in 2016. The least contribution for export earnings was made by Textiles sectors, with an amount of about 22% in 2015, before made 15.24% increase to around 37% in 2016.
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 67
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 56
Dear E-grader examiner,..
Dear E-grader examiner,..
Do i need to paraphrase the question first or I can just begin with overview sentences like what i did?
Really looking forward for your response..
Thank you so much
God bless you
It is better to paraphrase
It is better to paraphrase the question first.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...illion dollars in 2015, and went up 8.5% to approximately 65% in 2016. Meanwh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, third, well, while, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35393258427 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76617370296 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4227267293 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.142857143 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253256117589 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133767007085 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022191943442 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180552125853 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00590562366384 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.