The charts compare the volume of water utilized for the industry, agriculture, and houses in six various locations around the globe.
The charts compare the volume of water utilized for the industry, agriculture, and houses in six various locations around the globe.
Overall, it is crystal clear that with the exception of Europe and North America, agricultural usage was far higher than other counterparts.
Looking at the graphs, in Central Asia more water used for irrigation accounting for 88% in comparison with other areas. This followed by Africa, South East Asia, and South America with 84%, 81%, and 71% respectively. Europe and North America, on the other hand, employed far less water compared with other areas making 32% and 39% of the total respectively.
Regarding industrial usage, Europe ranked first with 53% and followed by North America with 48%. The proportion in South America and South East Asia was nearly 10% and in Africa and Central Asia was insignificant. In Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia approximately 8% used for dwellings. Conversely, other groups used around 15% for this purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-07 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 78 | view |
- The two layouts demonstrate the changes which had happened in road access to a city hospital by 2010. 67
- The line graph compares the rate of burglary, car theft, and robbery in Newport city over the course of nine years. 73
- It is true to say that the usage of fast food could contribute to devastating health problems 73
- It is true to say that normal people do not recycle their waste as far as possible. 73
- The pie charts compare online sales in four main areas for retail sectors in Newzealand in two different time spans. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...obe. Overall, it is crystal clear that with the exception of Europe and North America, agricultural ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, look, regarding, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.225 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68223321134 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5488136491 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242211075577 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145298614862 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.304839175655 0.0843802449381 361% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283713619116 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.41469521553 0.0819641961636 506% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.