the charts compares the cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe and the European average in 3 years.
The graph illustrates how many cars were possessed in 1000 people in five different European countries and the European average in three surveyed years.
It is clear that while the UK experienced a drop, the opposite trend was true for Italy, Germany and the average of Europe during the period shown. Additionally, Greece had the lowest figure of cars owned per 1000 inhabitants.
Regarding Italy, Germany and the European average, in 2005, there were approximately 500 people had cars in Italy, which were significantly lower than Germany and European; about 700 and 900 car owners respectively. Despite a slight fall in the next two years, both figures of Germany and European average climbed to nearly 1000 and 800 cars per 1000 residents in 2015. Meanwhile, the number of cars in Italy went up before going down to just over 500 cars.
According to the remaining nations, 1000 British citizens had almost 700 cars as many as that of French had in 2005. After a ten-year period, while the UK decreased constantly to under 600 cars in 100 people, the figure in France remained unchanged. By comparison with Greece, although there was a surge to 400 cars per 1000 citizens in 2009, this figure stabilized at about 300 cars in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | quanganh3110 | 84 | view |
- The chart below show different types of transport go to and from work in 1960, 1980, 2000. 56
- the charts compares the cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe and the European average in 3 years. 84
- The protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world 60
- the charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to Park Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service with 100 guests in 2005 and 2010. 61
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper as the result more adults work at home and children study at home Is this a positive or negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57921660134 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590476190476 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.186029376 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383343857953 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154282447842 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109627909582 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244316636876 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923596875038 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.