The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same period.
The two line graphs illustrate how much parents spent every month for their children on sports and how many children joined three sports in Britain from 2008 to 2014.
Overall, both the average monthly spending on sports and the number of children participated witnessed a remarkable increase during the period shown. Additionally, football was by far the most common sport among three surveyed games.
Looking at the first chart, British parents spent only 20 pounds on monthly average for their kids’ sports in 2008. Then the figure gradually rose until reaching approximately 32 pounds after a period of six years.
Regarding the children’s participation in sports, in 2008, there are just over 7.5 million kids took part in football, made up the highest number. By contrast, only a third of that went swimming and a mere 0.5 million took up athletics in the same year. While the figures for football and athletics participants relatively remained stable till 2010, the children went to swimming pools slightly increased to 2.5 million. In 2012, the number of children did athletics reached its peak at 5 million participants before falling just under that figure in 2014. More kids played football and went swimming in 2014, accounted for about 9 million and 4 million respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | marin123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | pritam | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | skelly | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper as the result more adults work at home and children study at home Is this a positive or negative development 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female smokers in Britain during the period between 1950 and 1990 86
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in group while others believe that it is better for them to study on their own. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The chart below show different types of transport go to and from work in 1960, 1980, 2000. 56
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The two line graphs illustrate how much parents spent every month for their chi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, regarding, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22857142857 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72247719663 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7531980139 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348812571959 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1286763106 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959823434616 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211469616786 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572720177968 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.