THE CHARTS GIVE INFORMATION ABOUT TWO GENRES OF tv PROGRAMMES WATCHED BY MEN AND WOMEN AND FOUR DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS IN AUSTRALIA.
The graphs give information about how male and female in four age group in Australia watch two types of TV programmes.
It is clear that in reality shows sector, the proportion of female watchers is bigger than that of male, wheareas, in terms of game shows, male and female almost have the same percentage.
In reality shows sphere, the percentage of male watchers (37%) is approximately half the percentage of female (70%). There is a small difference in the fingures of the 35 -40 year olds and the over 45 age group, at 69% and 68% respectively. The proportion of 25 -34 year olds is 60%, followed by 51% of the 16 – 24 age group.
Game shows has no significant difference between the proportions of two genders, 61% is the percentage of male and that of female is 60%. The highest fingure can be seen in the over 45 age group (70%), which is 20% higher than that of the second highest in 16 -24 age group (50%). The other two age groups has lower percentage, 41% of the 35 -44 year olds and 39% of the 25 -34 age group.
- the chart below shows the amount of energy consumed in 3 countries in the year 2000 and the rate of increase in energy consumption as compared with the year 1999 79
- : In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Scientists believe that by studying behavior of 3 years old children, we can predict if that child can become criminal in the future. To what extent is crime a product of human nature? Is it possible to stop children from growing to be a criminal? 56
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 78
- The civic centre will be planned to changr there are two maps one is the existing and the other is the plan for now 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.33333333333 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51626652448 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8747197295 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250259387318 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124312476664 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136569137189 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186988059458 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170201088577 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.13 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.