The charts give information about the volunteers by organization in 2008 and 2018. Summarizing the report by describing the main features with comparing data.
Two charts compare the proportion of participants in different kinds of organizations between 2008 and 2018.
Looking at the charts, we can see that the number of people involving in healthcare organization was by far the lowest in both years. While such organizations as sport, environment, and healthcare increased their attractiveness, the opposite pattern was seen for other categories.
Regarding the 2008 survey, education was the most popular kind of organization to be recorded, captivating nearly a quarter of volunteers involved. Volunteering in environment-related and art organizations was a less common choice with 21% and 18% participants respectively. While sport and other categories shared the same percentage of volunteers at 15%, organizations relating to healthcare attracted only a modest quantity at 7%.
2018 witnessed an increasing popularity of environmental organizations when 29% of participants were interested in this category, making it the most preferred working option. Those who relished working in sport organizations also rose by 10% compared to 2008. In contrast, education and art categories saw a decline in the participant proportion with 17% and 12% respectively, only half of the figure for sports. Healthcare and other categories absorbed 8% and 9% of volunteers, and healthcare organizations were still the least common among volunteers despite a slight rise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Two charts compare the proportion of par...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, regarding, so, still, while, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77990430622 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56216801987 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617224880383 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6670995634 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.8 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192640218854 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863830039767 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597780107686 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138721430975 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682868882207 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.