The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nation statistics.
The table compares four nations in terms of socio-economic situations categorized into four sectors, based on the data by the United Nations in 1994.
As can be seen in the table, Canada and Japan were the leading group in all four indicators. In the other group, the figures for Zaire were the lowest.
With regard to the economic situation, residents in Canada and Japan received excessively high incomes compared to Peru and Zaire. With an annual income of 15760 dollars per capita, Japan was the dominant nation in this aspect, while both Peru and Zaire shared an average income of 150 dollars. As for social aspects, the Canadian and Japanese both experienced a life expectancy of about 77 years old, much longer than Peru and Zaire with 51 and 47 years respectively.
When it comes to the average calorie supply, the figure for Canada was leading with 3326 calorie amounts per capita, while its counterparts’ figures were only below 3000 calories. Regarding the literacy rate, Japan and Canada proved their social development when 99% of adults were literate, almost doubling Zaire’s figure with merely 34%.
- People think that countries should produce foods their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows how photographs can be produced using digital photographic equipment 66
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is it the case Is it a positive development 84
- The graph provides information about the contribution of three primary sectors to the UK economy Write a report summarizing the differences 84
- The two maps below show the developments along Olive Drive before and after the construction of new facilities between 1980 and 2010 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., residents in Canada and Japan received excessively high incomes compared to Per...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, as for, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07027027027 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54777578128 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1746188532 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170779182009 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076632441165 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903295924963 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12289190321 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110350608929 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.