The given charts illustrates the average number of academic years spent at school and 5 levels of the highest education of learners between 2000 and 2010 in Singapore.
Overall, it can be seen that men had a tendency to pursue higher level of education in the whole surveyed period. Meanwhile, there was a substantial difference in the proportion of adults attending five education levels in educational system in Singapore over a 10-year period.
According to bar chart, the average levels of participation in education tended to slight rise in both genders from 2000 to 2010. It is obvious that the number of years male students using for studying was always higher than that of adult females. To be specific, at the beginning of the period, girls spent average 8 years to enroll in different levels of education, which is a little lower than the learning time of boys, with nearly 9 years. After 1 decade, the distance in the time for the purpose of learning between males and females became larger, with around 12 years for the former group and only 9 years for the latter group.
Furthermore, in 2000, 3 popular kinds of education patterns were high school, secondary school, and primary school with 32.13%, 26.3%, 25.77%, respectively. During a period of 10 years, the percentage of students only attend low-level education significantly declined by a half, only accounting for 19.55% for children aged 6-10 years old, 15.2 % for students raging from 11 to 14 years old. The year 2010 also witnessed the sharp increase in the figure of people who only completed the first 3 levels of education, from a quarter to 2.1%. In contrast, there were remarkably growth in the proportion of people pursuing higher qualification. Starting at 7.5% for master degree and 8.3% for university qualification, after a decade, these figure rose rapidly, reaching at 30.31% and 32.93%, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 803, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing at 30.31% and 32.93%, respectively.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 965.302439024 163% => OK
No of words: 313.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03833865815 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77212972882 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 106.607317073 167% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568690095847 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 283.868780488 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9130923778 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.416666667 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333019852671 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139189841077 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143017647735 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246686266136 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810672970397 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.